Yesterday afternoon, SGA executive board members voted against former SGA president Yvonne Harper as replacement for treasurer in a closed door meeting. This comes after the sudden resignation of Hugh Norko last week.
This vote comes with the continued frustration among the SGA, especially the executive board, for President Khoshkepazi’s leadership style and urgency in filling a position with a specific candidate.
In a leaked recording of the proceedings yesterday, Khoshkepazi expressed his reason for support of Yvonne Harper citing her recent appointment to Maryland Higher Education Commission and her previous experience with SGA.“Based on the interviews, she knows the ins and outs of the position and does not require as much training because she knows the ins and outs of this position and the SGA/CSI relationship and University of Baltimore policies that affect student organizations.”
Members of the executive board, however, felt the process to be rushed especially considering SGA conducted interviews prior to the application period being concluded.
SGA announced the opening via Facebook and Instagram on Thursday, August 27, roughly two days after Norko’s resignation with a deadline of Friday, August 28 at 11:59 for applications to be due.
“We did everything we could to find as many students as we could,” said Khoshkepazi to The Sting. “We advertised the position on social media and all members looked for people who could possibly be a good fit and possible considerations.”
Yet, according to emails obtained by The Sting, President Khsoshkepazi conducted his final two interviews on Friday, August 28 at 3:30PM and 4PM with two finalists, graduate students Jimmy Zheng and Yvonne Harper. At roughly 7:55 that evening, Khoshkepazi had made his selection of Yvonne Harper in an email sent to all SGA members and requested an emergency meeting be scheduled to fill the appointment.
An emergency meeting occurs without input from students who are not on SGA. Defending the meeting, Khoshkepazi said to The Sting, “This is an internal deliberation, and it is not unusual for organizations to dive into closed sessions especially when they are discussing personnel matters.”
Furthermore, President Khoshkepazi and Speaker of the Senate Joseph Ha requested that previous executive board members who had a working relationship with Yvonne Harper abstain from voting.
Secretary April King and Chief of Staff Amadou Bah served in their previous capacities to Yvonne Harper during her tenure as president. Vice President Kevin McHugh ran against Harper for her slot as president. If the three abstained from voting, Yvonne Harper would either not be able to be voted by the Executive Board or be bypass the executive board by default.
The reluctance to support Yvonne, says Khoshkepazi, comes from these previous relationships and is a clear example why these executive board members should abstain.
“The Finance Committee is supposed to meet as early as next Friday and the only person who can realistically do the role in such a short notice is Yvonne Harper”, said Khoshkepazi, in the email sent on Friday evening. “She has spearheaded the constitutional rewrite last year that created the process we have now, and based on her myriad of experiences is the perfect candidate to pull us forward.”
Later, this claim would be debunked by both CSI director and SGA faculty advisor Anthony Butler and another employee of the Center for Student Involvement, Zachary Lumen.
“If you select a treasurer and the Senate confirms them tomorrow,” explained Butler, in regards to the meeting yesterday. “It is unlikely that person can get up to speed on all of the previous committee discussions on student organization allocations in a way that would be helpful to the appeals meeting.”
“We are at the start of the semester and over the summer we worked hard to make sure that we were ahead”, explained Khoshkepazi when asked by The Sting about the urgency in filling the position. “The position of the treasurer is a vital role, and we need to recruit someone as soon as possible to ensure that all duties of the treasurer can be performed. We are a team, and a team cannot work efficiently when there is a vacancy.”
On the night prior to the meeting, an argument amidst the email thread to submit an agenda for the emergency meeting.
In emails to arrange the emergency meeting, Secretary April King expressed concerns that President Khoshkepazi was acting outside of constitutional boundaries. She insisted that the executive board had not properly approved the candidate as required by the constitution.
April King refused to place Yvonne Harper as the candidate for nomination on the agenda as she felt Khoshkepazi failed to earn the constitutionally mandated support of the executive board. Khoshkepazi responded by stating that the executive board would have the opportunity to approve or reject Harper at the meeting prior to the Senate confirmation.
“As the executive board hasn’t voted on a candidate to be nominated, I wrote the agenda according to the correct Constitutional procedure,” said King in the email. “I think it’s important to have the agenda detail the procedural steps of the process.”
The constitution does state that compiling and approving candidates is a function of the entire executive board not the president exclusively.
Khoshkepazi argued that it was the responsibility of the president to make appointments and for the Senate to approve. King and Bah were the most vocal in their disagreements with Khoshkepazi’s interpretation of the constitution.
At Wednesday’s meeting, all three executive board members in question voted against the nomination of Yvonne Harper and against placing Jimmy Zheng as a graduate senator.
“The executive board needed more time to consider candidates for this position,” said Kevin McHugh, after the meeting. “I never understood the rush anyway.”